COVERAGE MAP FRAME · HURRICANE LANDFALL

Coverage maps for hurricane landfall staging.

Crew staging and outage prediction depend on track, intensity, and decay-over-land forecasts. The coverage-map question is where more upper-air observations could improve the picture before landfall.

Taborlin prepares these public-data map frames to support Sorcerer introductions. The question is how current upper-air observations compare with the event exposure across your territory.

Walk through a coverage mapCurrent NOAA obs · candidate Sorcerer coverage

01 — THE DECISION AT STAKE

Pre-storm crew staging and outage prediction

COVERAGE QUESTION

Where routine offshore and boundary-layer observations are thin relative to landfall staging decisions.

WHAT TO REVIEW WITH SORCERER

Review where additional Sorcerer balloon profiles could improve offshore and near-coastal coverage.

02 — LIVE MAP FORMAT

Wildfire shows the live format; this event type needs its own coverage map.

The question is not “does hurricane response need more weather data?” in the abstract. The question is how current upper-air observations compare with event exposure and what additional Sorcerer balloon coverage could look like. The live wildfire maps below show the format until a matching hurricane response map is built.

LIVE UTILITY COVERAGE ANALYSISPUBLIC-DATA MAP

PG&E

PG&E wildfire coverage map

A public-data view comparing current NOAA/NWS upper-air references, public surface stations, fire-threat areas, and candidate Sorcerer balloon coverage near exposed northern and central California corridors.

Live

coverage analysis

CA

public-data slice

5

scenario layers

THE DECISION AT STAKE

Where wildfire, PSPS, meteorology, and emergency teams may want to review additional balloon observations around exposed corridors.

WHAT WE MAPPED

CEC transmission features, CPUC fire-threat districts, public surface weather stations, NOAA/NWS upper-air sites, and candidate Sorcerer balloon coverage zones.

CAVEAT

This is a public-data case study, not a claim that PG&E lacks monitoring or a validated deployment recommendation.

03 — WHY SORCERER

The useful meeting is about coverage, not generic weather data.

Utilities already have weather tools. The map adds a narrower question: how does the current NOAA/NWS upper-air observation layer compare with the places where utility weather decisions are made? Sorcerer (sorcerer.earth, YC S24) is the company to evaluate if additional balloon observations look useful.

Routine soundings

NOAA/NWS weather balloon launch sites provide the current upper-air reference layer

Surface networks

Utility and public weather stations show the ground-level monitoring picture

Event exposure

Transmission corridors, fire-threat areas, coastlines, terrain, and load zones set the context

Candidate coverage

Sorcerer balloon scenarios show what additional upper-air observations could look like

Vertical profile

Balloon observations can sample wind, moisture, temperature, and boundary-layer structure

Taskable coverage

Event-specific balloon placement can focus on the air mass that matters for the decision

Forecast workflow

The meeting question is whether added profiles could improve the operational forecast

Public-data caveat

These are scouting maps for discussion, not deployment recommendations

Technical points summarize Sorcerer materials and public-data map assumptions. Validate any operational use directly with Sorcerer and the utility team.

05 — HOW IT WORKS

From public coverage map to Sorcerer introduction.

STEP 1

Choose the event

Start with the utility decision: wildfire/PSPS, landfall staging, ice loading, heat load, or storm response.

STEP 2

Compare current coverage

Overlay public utility assets, weather stations, NOAA/NWS upper-air launch sites, and event exposure.

STEP 3

Review Sorcerer coverage

Use candidate balloon coverage scenarios to make the Sorcerer introduction concrete and utility-specific.

Walk through a coverage mapOr reply to the outreach email that brought you here.